Road to the Middle Class
Saturday November 22, 2008 
compiled by Christopher Chantrill

HOME

DOWNLOAD

DOWNLOAD ALL

INK

FEATURED

How we got data

Data Sources

Update Schedule

World War II Spending

Gov. Transfers

US BUDGET DATA

Budget FY09

Budget FY08

Budget FY07

US CENSUS BUREAU

State, Local Fin.

Class Manual

Categories

USCB Codes

Stat Abstract

Hist. Stats

print view

World War I Defense Spending

by Christopher Chantrill
March 20, 2008

DURING WORLD War I defense spending in the United States exploded from less than one percent of GDP in 1915 to a peak of 14 percent in 1919 and then back down to one percent by 1923.

But the data series of “Series Y 605-637. Federal Government Expenditure, by Function: 1902 to 1970” in the Census Bureau’s Historical Statistics of the United States: From Colonial Times to 1970 only tabulates federal spending for 1913 and 1922, completely missing out on the years of World War I.

But the Census Bureau does publish annual federal government expenditures in another table, “Series Y 457-465. Outlays of the Federal Government: 1789-1970.” The problem is that the numbers in the two Census Bureau tables don’t match up.

Comparison of World War I Defense Spending
(millions of dollars)
Spending Item1913191419151916191719181919192019211922
Census Bureau Numbers from “Series Y 605-637. Federal Government Expenditure, by Function: 1902 to 1970”
Total Spending 970            3,763
Total national defense 250             875
Military services only 245             864
Interest 23             988
Census Bureau Numbers from “Series Y 457-465. Outlays of the Federal Government: 1789-1970.”
Total Spending 715 725 746 713 1,954 12,677 18,493 6,358 5,062 3,289
Total defense spending 335 347 343 337 618 6,149 11,011 2,358 1,768 935
War Dept. spending 202 208 202 183 378 4,870 9,009 1,622 1,118 458
Navy Dept. spending 133 139 141 154 240 1,279 2,002 736 650 477
Interest 23 23 23 23 25 189 619 1,020 999 991

You can see the problem. The entire war spending effort is missing from the data series that we are using. And in 1913 and 1922 they don’t match up.

We chose to fill in the missing numbers by matching the spending numbers from “Outlays of the Federal Government: 1789-1970” to the numbers on the incomplete “Federal Government Expenditure by Function: 1902-1970.” then track the trajectory of the numbers in the Outlays dataset. Here are the results:

Construction of World War I Defense Spending Dataset
(millions of dollars)
Spending Item1913191419151916191719181919192019211922
Numbers interpolated from Outlay table shown in italic.
Total expenditure 970 1,004 1,050 1,041 2,306 13,054 18,894 6,783 5,512 3,763
Total defense & intl 250 265 264 260 544 6,078 10,943 2,292 1,705 875
Military only 245 259 257 253 536 6,070 10,934 2,283 1,695 864
Interest 23 23 22 22 24 187 617 1,018 996 988

We have interpolated values for national defense and for total federal spending by applying the entire Outlays data items to the Expenditures table by adjusting all numbers so that they match the numbers in the Expenditure table for 1913 and 1922.

Christopher Chantrill blogs at www.roadtothemiddleclass.com.  His Road to the Middle Class is forthcoming.

print view

 

 


Education

“We have met with families in which for weeks together, not an article of sustenance but potatoes had been used; yet for every child the hard-earned sum was provided to send them to school.”
E. G. West, Education and the State


Mutual Aid

In 1911... at least nine million of the 12 million covered by national insurance were already members of voluntary sick pay schemes. A similar proportion were also eligible for medical care.
Green, Reinventing Civil Society


Government Expenditure

The Union publishes an exact return of the amount of its taxes; I can get copies of the budgets of the four and twenty component states; but who can tell me what the citizens spend in the administration of county and township?
Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America


Democratic Capitalism

Three dynamic and converging systems functioning as one: a democratic polity, an economy based on markets and incentives, and a moral-cultural system which is plural and, in the largest sense, liberal.
Michael Novak, The Spirit of Democratic Capitalism